The
nationwide bust up over how a certain liquor baron made bankers kiss dirt,
walking away with bagful of cash through a VIP channel, possibly to an
undisclosed city in Europe, is making headlines and triggering breaking news
almost every day now.
But questions need to be raised about the curious case of
billionaire Subrata Roy who paid loads of cash to the market regulator
and last week completed two years behind bars in Delhi's maximum security
prison.
Roy, who recently wrote a tome on his life experiences, is now
called a philosophical author by many .
Jokes apart, someone seriously needs to scrutinise the case
again, especially at the way the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)
handled it and the way Sahara group demonstrated considerable resilience.
A few days ago, a handful of Sahara employees protested the delay in payment of
salaries; they were in their undergarments. The idea was to be visible
on television.
But what's happening in the case?
On 31 August, 2012, the apex court had asked SEBI to return
money to Sahara's investors. In the last 40 months, it has been able to pay Rs
50 crores. The Mumbai-based market regulator advertised four times in as many
as 144 newspapers, inviting demands for repayment. Worse, the fourth
advertisement said it was the last opportunity for raising demand for
repayment.
Does that mean that - under any circumstances - SEBI
won't be able to pay over Rs 100 crores? And what has it got in its kitty?
It has received a whopping Rs 12,000 crores and even earned interests on FDs.
Also, SEBI has the property papers of Sahara's land bank worth Rs 40,000 crore
in its custody. There are chances it will have another Rs 5,800 crore ( Rs 800
crore cash and Rs 5,000 crore bank guarantee) by the time Roy and his two
directors walk out of the prison gates. Sahara, which sought time for raising
the stipulated cash from its assets for SEBI, was given a 45-day extension that
ended in November 2015. The group claimed it had five "solid offers"
for its properties.
The slugfest between the market regulator and Sahara has been
described as corporate India's best known samudra manthan.
SEBI disputes Sahara's claim that it has paid 95 per cent of its investors from
whom it had collected Rs 24,000 crores through optionally fully convertible
debentures (OFCD) in 2009-10, after the written permission from 2 Registrars of
Companies. The Supreme Court however, upheld SEBI's plea and directed that
Saharas' investors have to be refunded the money along with interest through
SEBI.
The billion dollar question that needs to be raised is when will
SEBI verify the authenticity of these investors? If four advertisements have
failed, doesn't it become obligatory for SEBI to verify Sahara's repayment
claim? After all, the Supreme Court says the the final decision on the issue of
unpaid investors lies with SEBI. The market regulator, which said in January
2013 that it wanted to hire a verification agency, has reportedly failed to
organise one. So who will help ascertain the genuineness of bondholders in the
Sahara case.
Look at the way the events have progressed. SEBI has not given
any reason for withholding its notice inviting the tenders. The first tender to
seek a verification agency was floated on 2 November, 2012. SEBI asking for
applications by 22 November, 2012. It did not happen and so the deadline was
extended to 21 December, 2012, and again extended till 15 January, 2013. After
the expiry of this last deadline, SEBI decided to withhold the tender notice.
It is now March 2016. Someone must ask questions, either in
court or on televised debates. Otherwise, the billionaire, will have no
option but to write the second sequel of his planned trilogy.
